Question 1: Boldface (role)
Medium · Argument Construction
Some Linwood board members propose that the district stop buying printed textbooks and give each student a tablet loaded with digital editions, citing the lower price of digital editions. That price comparison omits two costs. Tablets need replacing every three or four years, while printed textbooks last about eight, and digital editions are licensed for a fixed term rather than owned. Counting both costs, the proposal would not save the district money over any period beyond a few years.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
- A. The first is the argument's main conclusion; the second is evidence offered in its support.
- B. The first is evidence the argument presents against a proposal; the second is the proposal that the argument opposes.
- C. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is a premise offered in support of a further conclusion.
- D. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
- E. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is a consideration that the argument concedes weighs in favor of that proposal.
Show the answer and explanation
Answer: D. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
- A. The argument does not endorse the proposal; it spends every sentence after the first arguing against it.
- B. This swaps the two roles. The proposal is the first portion, and the second is what the argument concludes about it.
- C. The replacement and licensing costs are the premises. The second portion is what they support, and nothing further is drawn from it.
- D. Correct. The argument sets out the proposal, supplies two omitted costs, and concludes that the proposal would not save money.
- E. The only point conceded to the proposal is the lower price of digital editions, and that is not in boldface. The second portion counts against the proposal.
How to solve it
The first portion states what the board members propose. The rest of the passage argues against it: two omitted costs are offered as evidence, and the final sentence draws the point they support. Nothing else in the passage is supported by that final claim, so the second portion is the main conclusion.
Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.
