Skip to main content

GMAT Critical Reasoning questions, with every answer explained

Critical Reasoning is one of the two question formats in the GMAT Focus Edition’s Verbal Reasoning section, alongside Reading Comprehension. Each question gives you a short argument and asks you to do something with it: find the assumption it depends on, weaken or strengthen it, explain a puzzle, or judge a plan. The section allows 45 minutes for 23 questions, about 1 minute 57 seconds each.

Below are 25 Critical Reasoning questions grouped into the 9 question types you will meet, with a short method for each type. Every question has a worked explanation and names the trap behind each wrong answer, because recognising the trap is most of the skill.

How a Critical Reasoning question works

Almost every question is built on the same skeleton. There is a conclusion (what the author wants you to believe), evidence (the facts offered for it), and a gap between them: something the author takes for granted. Assumption, weaken, strengthen, evaluate and flaw questions are all questions about that gap, asked from different directions. Inference and discrepancy questions have no conclusion to attack, only facts to reason from.

A method that holds for every type:

  1. Read the question line first, so you know what you are reading the argument for.
  2. Find the conclusion, then the evidence, and put the gap into your own words before looking at the choices.
  3. Predict what the right answer has to do. You will rarely predict its wording, but you can predict its job.
  4. Eliminate by trap. Most wrong answers belong to a handful of families, listed below. Naming why a choice is wrong is faster and safer than hunting for the right one.
  5. Check the survivor against the exact question line. “Most seriously weakens” and “most useful to establish” want different things.

Are “GMAT logic questions” the same thing?

Usually, yes. People searching for GMAT logic or reasoning questions mostly mean Critical Reasoning. The GMAT does not test formal logic, with symbols or truth tables. It tests whether an everyday argument holds up, which is what every question on this page practises.

The traps, counted

Every wrong answer on this page was written to catch a specific error, and each explanation names it. Across the 100 wrong answers below, this is how often each trap appears.

Wrong-answer traps across the 25 Critical Reasoning questions on this page
TrapWhat it doesWrong answers
Out of scopeBrings in a matter the argument never raises, so it can neither help nor hurt it.19 (19%)
True, but irrelevantA believable fact that never touches the link between evidence and conclusion.16 (16%)
A plausible misreadingDistorts a detail of the passage just enough to seem to match it.14 (14%)
Answers a different questionWould be right for a different prompt, such as a strengthener offered to a weaken question.13 (13%)
Right topic, wrong directionBears on the argument, but pushes it the opposite way from the one asked for.12 (12%)
Too strongClaims more than the passage supports or more than the argument needs.9 (9%)
One step shortHeads the right way but leaves the key gap open.8 (8%)
Uses only part of the passageFits one piece of the information while ignoring another piece that rules it out.5 (5%)
Right relationship, wrong pairApplies the correct kind of reasoning to the wrong two things.3 (3%)
Cause and effect reversedTurns the stated relationship around.1 (1%)

Boldface (role) questions

Looks like: “The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?”

The task: Say what job each highlighted sentence does in the argument, not whether it is true.

How to attack it: Find the argument’s main conclusion first. Then label each bold portion in your own words, such as the conclusion, evidence for it, a claim the author rejects, or evidence against the author, before looking at the choices. Most wrong answers get one of the two roles right.

Question 1: Boldface (role)

Medium · Argument Construction

Some Linwood board members propose that the district stop buying printed textbooks and give each student a tablet loaded with digital editions, citing the lower price of digital editions. That price comparison omits two costs. Tablets need replacing every three or four years, while printed textbooks last about eight, and digital editions are licensed for a fixed term rather than owned. Counting both costs, the proposal would not save the district money over any period beyond a few years.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

  1. A. The first is the argument's main conclusion; the second is evidence offered in its support.
  2. B. The first is evidence the argument presents against a proposal; the second is the proposal that the argument opposes.
  3. C. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is a premise offered in support of a further conclusion.
  4. D. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
  5. E. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is a consideration that the argument concedes weighs in favor of that proposal.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: D. The first is a proposal that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

  • A. The argument does not endorse the proposal; it spends every sentence after the first arguing against it.
  • B. This swaps the two roles. The proposal is the first portion, and the second is what the argument concludes about it.
  • C. The replacement and licensing costs are the premises. The second portion is what they support, and nothing further is drawn from it.
  • D. Correct. The argument sets out the proposal, supplies two omitted costs, and concludes that the proposal would not save money.
  • E. The only point conceded to the proposal is the lower price of digital editions, and that is not in boldface. The second portion counts against the proposal.

How to solve it

The first portion states what the board members propose. The rest of the passage argues against it: two omitted costs are offered as evidence, and the final sentence draws the point they support. Nothing else in the passage is supported by that final claim, so the second portion is the main conclusion.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 2: Boldface (role)

Hard · Argument Construction

Archivists report that letters written in the colony of Aldern before 1750 mention smallpox far more often than later letters do. Some historians conclude that the disease struck Aldern less often after 1750. Yet nearly all surviving letters from before 1750 were written in port towns, where outbreaks usually began, whereas most surviving later letters were written by settlers in the interior. The decline in mentions may therefore reflect a change in who was writing rather than in how often the disease struck.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

  1. A. The first is evidence for a conclusion the argument challenges; the second is that conclusion.
  2. B. The first is a finding whose accuracy the argument disputes; the second is evidence offered to show that the finding is mistaken.
  3. C. The first is a finding that the argument accepts while disputing some historians' reading of it; the second supports the argument's own explanation.
  4. D. The first is a finding that the argument accepts; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
  5. E. The first is a conclusion that some historians have drawn; the second is evidence that the argument offers against that conclusion.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. The first is a finding that the argument accepts while disputing some historians' reading of it; the second supports the argument's own explanation.

  • A. The second portion supports the argument's own explanation. The conclusion the argument challenges is the historians' claim in the second sentence.
  • B. The argument accepts that earlier letters mention smallpox more often. It disputes the inference drawn from that fact, not the fact.
  • C. Correct. The finding stands, the historians' reading of it is challenged, and the second portion backs the rival reading.
  • D. The second portion is a premise. The conclusion it supports is the final sentence, about who was writing the letters.
  • E. The second half fits, but the historians' conclusion is the unbolded second sentence; the first portion is the finding they draw it from.

How to solve it

The argument never doubts the archivists' finding; it disputes what the finding shows. The historians read it as fewer outbreaks. The argument proposes that the letter writers moved inland, and the second portion is its evidence for that. The final sentence, not in boldface, is the conclusion.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Explain a discrepancy

Looks like: “Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain…”

The task: Two facts seem to conflict. Find the one new fact that lets both be true at the same time.

How to attack it: State the conflict in one sentence (“X happened, yet Y”). The right answer touches both sides of it. Choices that merely restate one side, or that would make the puzzle worse, are the traps.

Question 3: Explain a discrepancy

Easy · Argument Construction

During last year's drought in the state of Carver, hay became scarce and its price nearly doubled. Economists in the state had predicted that the drought would also push up the prices paid for cattle at Carver's livestock auctions, because ranchers would be able to raise fewer calves. Instead, auction prices for cattle fell sharply while the drought lasted, even though national demand for beef held steady throughout that period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why cattle prices at Carver's auctions fell?

  1. A. Many Carver ranchers who could not afford hay at its new price sold large parts of their herds at the auctions.
  2. B. Retail prices for beef in grocery stores across the country rose slightly during the months the drought lasted.
  3. C. Ranchers in Carver expect the drought to end within two years, after which hay prices should soon return to their normal levels.
  4. D. Hay is only one of several kinds of feed that ranchers in Carver give their cattle at different times over the course of a year.
  5. E. The drought also cut yields of the corn that local farmers sell to ranchers as feed.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: A. Many Carver ranchers who could not afford hay at its new price sold large parts of their herds at the auctions.

  • A. Correct. A wave of forced sales floods the auctions with cattle, which pushes prices down while demand holds steady.
  • B. Rising beef prices point to firm demand, which makes falling cattle prices harder to explain, not easier.
  • C. Expectations about the future of hay prices say nothing about why cattle prices fell during the drought itself.
  • D. This suggests the hay shortage mattered less, which if anything removes pressure on ranchers rather than explaining a price fall.
  • E. Dearer feed of every kind is a cause, but the step that actually moves auction prices, ranchers selling off cattle, is left unstated.

How to solve it

Prices fall when supply rises faster than demand. With demand steady, the explanation has to be a surge of cattle into the auctions. Ranchers who cannot afford feed sell their animals, and a drought that doubles the price of hay forces exactly that.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 4: Explain a discrepancy

Medium · Argument Construction

Seeds generally remain able to sprout for longer when they are stored at lower temperatures. The Halden Seed Bank dries every seed to a moisture level safe for storage at 0 degrees Fahrenheit and then stores it in one of two vaults, one kept at 0 degrees Fahrenheit and the other at 40 degrees. Yet when the bank tested seeds that had spent ten years in storage, a smaller proportion of the seeds from the colder vault sprouted.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

  1. A. Seeds stored at very low temperatures must be thoroughly dried first, or ice crystals forming inside them can destroy them.
  2. B. Keeping the warmer vault at its set temperature costs the bank much less each year than keeping the colder vault at its set temperature does.
  3. C. Seed banks in several other countries have found that seeds kept at 0 degrees Fahrenheit can still sprout after many decades.
  4. D. The seeds tested from each vault were drawn at random from all the seeds that had been stored there for ten years.
  5. E. The bank reserves the colder vault for species whose seeds lose the ability to sprout most quickly.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: E. The bank reserves the colder vault for species whose seeds lose the ability to sprout most quickly.

  • A. The bank dries every seed to a level safe for storage at 0 degrees Fahrenheit, so the ice damage this describes cannot explain the colder vault's worse result.
  • B. Running costs may explain why there are two vaults, but not why the colder one produced worse results.
  • C. More evidence that cold preserves seeds deepens the puzzle rather than resolving it.
  • D. Random sampling rules out one explanation, a biased test, but supplies nothing that accounts for the result.
  • E. Correct. The two vaults hold different kinds of seed, so comparing them does not isolate the effect of temperature.

How to solve it

Cold storage helps any given seed, so the colder vault can only do worse if it holds different seeds. If the bank sends its most fragile species to the cold vault precisely because they decline fastest, those seeds can sprout less often after ten years than hardy seeds kept warmer, even though the cold slowed their decline.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 5: Explain a discrepancy

Hard · Argument Construction

Crestmoor University publishes the average starting salary of its graduates each year, both for the university as a whole and separately for each of its five colleges. For last year's graduating class, the average starting salary rose, compared with the year before, in every one of the five colleges. Nevertheless, the average starting salary for the university's graduates as a whole was lower last year than it had been the year before.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain how both of these results could have occurred?

  1. A. Average starting salaries for new college graduates across the country as a whole rose by more last year than those of Crestmoor's graduates did.
  2. B. A larger share of last year's graduates than of the previous year's came from the colleges whose graduates earn the lowest salaries.
  3. C. The college whose graduates earn the highest starting salaries recorded the largest increase in its average last year.
  4. D. Fewer of last year's graduates than of the previous year's reported their starting salaries to the university.
  5. E. Several of Crestmoor's colleges have recently raised admission standards, attracting stronger students.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: B. A larger share of last year's graduates than of the previous year's came from the colleges whose graduates earn the lowest salaries.

  • A. A national comparison says nothing about how Crestmoor's own figures could move in opposite directions.
  • B. Correct. More weight on the lowest-paid colleges drags the overall average down even though each college's average rose.
  • C. A big gain at the best-paid college should lift the overall average, which deepens the puzzle.
  • D. A lower response rate could distort the figures, but nothing says it shifted them in the direction needed to produce both results.
  • E. Stronger students could explain why each college's average rose, but not why the university's overall average fell.

How to solve it

An overall average is a weighted average of the college averages, weighted by how many graduates each college produces. If the weights shift toward colleges whose graduates earn less, the overall figure can fall even while every college improves. Only a change in the mix of graduates reconciles the two results.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Flaw questions

Looks like: “The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it…”

The task: Name the error in the reasoning.

How to attack it: Separate the evidence from the conclusion and ask what the author took for granted. The usual suspects are treating a correlation as a cause, generalizing from an unrepresentative sample, and assuming the very thing being argued. The right choice describes the gap you found, in abstract wording.

Question 6: Flaw

Easy · Argument Evaluation

Reelhouse, a video streaming service, recently surveyed 4,000 of its subscribers, choosing them at random from among those who had watched at least one episode of one of its documentary series during the past year. Of those surveyed, 85 percent said they would like Reelhouse to offer more documentaries. On the strength of this survey, the service's executives concluded that most Reelhouse subscribers would like the service to offer more documentaries.

The executives' reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

  1. A. fails to consider whether documentaries cost more to produce than the other kinds of programs Reelhouse offers
  2. B. assumes without justification that subscribers who ask for more documentaries would actually spend time watching them if Reelhouse were to offer them
  3. C. takes for granted that the preferences subscribers expressed in the survey will not change over the coming years
  4. D. relies on too small a survey to support a reliable conclusion about the service's subscribers
  5. E. generalizes about subscribers as a whole from a group especially likely to favor documentaries
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: E. generalizes about subscribers as a whole from a group especially likely to favor documentaries

  • A. Production cost matters to a decision about programming, but the conclusion is only about what subscribers want.
  • B. The executives conclude only that subscribers want more documentaries, not that they would watch them.
  • C. The conclusion describes current preferences and makes no prediction about future ones.
  • D. Four thousand randomly chosen respondents is a large sample. The trouble is whom they were chosen from, not how many there were.
  • E. Correct. Everyone surveyed had already chosen to watch a documentary series, so their enthusiasm cannot stand for all subscribers.

How to solve it

The sample was drawn only from subscribers who already watch documentaries, a group far more likely than subscribers in general to want more of them. A random pick from a biased pool is still a biased sample, so the survey cannot speak for the subscriber base as a whole.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 7: Flaw

Medium · Argument Evaluation

In 2012, coal-fired power plants generated 60 percent of the electricity produced in Marston County. By 2022 their share had fallen to 35 percent, while wind farms built during the decade had come to supply a further 25 percent. The county's two coal-fired plants remained in operation throughout the entire period. A local environmental group has cited these figures as showing that Marston's coal-fired plants generated less electricity in 2022 than they did in 2012.

The group's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

  1. A. fails to establish that wind farms generate electricity at a lower cost than coal-fired plants do
  2. B. overlooks the possibility that total electricity production in the county rose substantially between 2012 and 2022
  3. C. presumes that the wind farms built during the decade will go on expanding
  4. D. ignores the fact that some of the county's electricity comes from sources other than coal and wind
  5. E. overlooks the possibility that coal-fired plants in the counties bordering Marston greatly increased the amount of electricity they generated over the same decade
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: B. overlooks the possibility that total electricity production in the county rose substantially between 2012 and 2022

  • A. Relative cost bears on which source is preferable, not on how much electricity the coal plants produced.
  • B. Correct. A falling share is compatible with a rising amount whenever the total grows fast enough.
  • C. The argument makes no prediction; its conclusion is about what happened between 2012 and 2022.
  • D. The argument's own figures leave room for other sources, and what those sources are has no bearing on whether coal output fell.
  • E. The conclusion concerns Marston's own plants; output elsewhere cannot make it true or false.

How to solve it

The figures are shares of the county's output, and the conclusion is about an amount. A smaller share of a larger total can be a larger amount: if total production rose by more than about 70 percent, the coal plants generated more in 2022 than in 2012, not less. The group never establishes that the total held steady.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Assumption questions

Looks like: “Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?”

The task: Find the unstated premise the conclusion cannot survive without.

How to attack it: Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion. Then use the negation test: turn each remaining choice into its opposite. If the argument falls apart, that choice is the assumption. Choices that would help the argument but are not required are the most common trap.

Question 8: Assumption

Easy · Argument Construction

Greenfield Publishing sells its cookery titles mainly through independent bookshops. Last year it began offering those shops a deeper trade discount, and its cookery sales rose sharply. The company now plans to extend the same discount to its gardening titles, which it also sells mainly through independent shops, and expects gardening sales to rise by a comparable amount. Greenfield's gardening list is roughly the same size as its cookery list, and both are priced similarly.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. A. Greenfield will be able to maintain its current profit margin on gardening titles even after the deeper trade discount has been applied to them.
  2. B. Last year's rise in cookery sales was not produced chiefly by factors largely absent from the gardening market.
  3. C. Most independent bookshops currently stock a considerably wider range of cookery titles than of gardening titles.
  4. D. Greenfield Publishing has sold gardening titles through independent shops for far longer than it has sold any of its cookery titles there.
  5. E. The readers who buy gardening books are generally drawn to the same authors as the readers who buy Greenfield's cookery books.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: B. Last year's rise in cookery sales was not produced chiefly by factors largely absent from the gardening market.

  • A. The prediction concerns sales, not margin. A publisher can lift sales on a thinner margin and the argument stands.
  • B. Correct. If some other factor drove the cookery rise, the discount carries no predictive weight for gardening.
  • C. The relative breadth of the two categories on the shelf is never used by the argument and need not be true.
  • D. How long each list has been in the channel does not bear on whether a deeper discount will lift it.
  • E. The argument turns on the behaviour of shops, not of readers; overlapping authorship is neither needed nor claimed.

How to solve it

The plan copies a discount and expects a copied result. That follows only if the discount, rather than something peculiar to last year's cookery market, produced the earlier rise. Negate the assumption and the precedent carries no weight at all.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 9: Assumption

Easy · Argument Construction

Most of the litter collected on the public beach in the town of Hollis consists of food wrappers and drink containers. To reduce this litter, the town council has decided to prohibit the beachfront kiosks from selling any packaged food or bottled drinks, and it expects the amount of litter on the beach to fall substantially as a result. The kiosks will still be allowed to rent umbrellas and beach chairs.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the council's expectation depends?

  1. A. The kiosks earn more from food and drink sales than from chair rentals.
  2. B. No other town along the coast has tried to reduce beach litter by limiting what beachfront businesses may sell.
  3. C. Food wrappers and drink containers do more harm to shore birds and marine animals than most other kinds of litter found on the beach do.
  4. D. Visitors unable to buy packaged food and drinks at the kiosks will not bring comparable amounts from elsewhere.
  5. E. All of the wrappers and containers now found on the beach come from food and drinks bought at the kiosks.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: D. Visitors unable to buy packaged food and drinks at the kiosks will not bring comparable amounts from elsewhere.

  • A. The kiosks' income matters to their owners, but litter can fall whichever way their revenue splits.
  • B. Whether the idea is new has no bearing on whether it will work in Hollis.
  • C. This would make the ban more worthwhile, but the expectation concerns how much litter there is, not how harmful it is.
  • D. Correct. If they did, the same wrappers and containers would reach the beach and the litter would not fall.
  • E. The plan can cut litter substantially if the kiosks supply a large share of it; they need not supply all of it.

How to solve it

The ban removes one source of packaged food, not the demand for it. If visitors simply buy the same snacks in town and carry them to the beach, the wrappers still arrive. The expectation depends on visitors not replacing what the kiosks no longer sell; negate that and the plan achieves nothing.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 10: Assumption

Medium · Argument Construction

A vineyard in a cold valley loses part of its crop in most years to spring frost. The owner is considering installing large fans that draw warmer air down from above the frost layer on still nights. Fans of this kind have protected orchards in the same valley, and the owner calculates that the fruit saved in an average year would exceed the annual cost of running and maintaining the fans.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. A. The fans will protect the whole of the vineyard's crop in every year they are switched on in time.
  2. B. The orchards in the valley that installed fans grow fruit that ripens at about the same time as grapes do.
  3. C. Capital to install the fans can be borrowed by the vineyard at a reasonable rate.
  4. D. The frosts damaging the vineyard's crop occur chiefly on nights still enough for a layer of warmer air to lie above the vines.
  5. E. Grapes are more vulnerable to a late spring frost than the fruit grown in the valley's orchards.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: D. The frosts damaging the vineyard's crop occur chiefly on nights still enough for a layer of warmer air to lie above the vines.

  • A. The owner needs only that enough fruit is saved to beat the running cost, not that the whole crop survives.
  • B. Ripening dates are irrelevant; the frosts at issue occur in spring, long before either crop is ready.
  • C. Financing bears on whether the fans can be bought, whereas the argument is about whether they would pay.
  • D. Correct. Negate it and the fans have no warm layer to draw down, so the saving the calculation rests on disappears.
  • E. Greater vulnerability would if anything weaken the transfer from orchards, and the argument does not require it.

How to solve it

The fans work only by pulling down a warmer layer that sits above the vines, and such a layer forms on still nights. If the vineyard's damaging frosts arrive on windy nights, or without that layer, there is nothing for the fans to draw on and no fruit is saved.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 11: Assumption

Hard · Argument Construction

A mining company reports that the average grade of the ore it raised last year was higher than in the year before, and that its cost of producing a tonne of refined metal fell over the same period. The company's chief executive attributes the lower cost to the richer ore and predicts a further fall next year, since the section of the deposit now being worked is richer still.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. A. The richer section of the deposit now being worked will yield ore of a higher grade than any that the company has ever raised before.
  2. B. The price that the company receives for a tonne of refined metal will not fall during the coming year.
  3. C. Ore grades at the deposits worked by the company's competitors are falling.
  4. D. No factor that helped lower the cost of production last year will reverse enough next year to offset the richer ore.
  5. E. Last year's fall in the cost of producing refined metal was caused by the richer ore.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: D. No factor that helped lower the cost of production last year will reverse enough next year to offset the richer ore.

  • A. An all-time record is not needed; the forecast requires only that the ore be richer than last year's was.
  • B. The prediction concerns the cost of production, which is unaffected by what the metal sells for.
  • C. Competitors' deposits have no bearing on this company's own cost of production.
  • D. Correct. Negate it and a reversing factor cancels the benefit of the richer ore, so the predicted fall need not occur.
  • E. This restates the chief executive's stated reason rather than identifying something the argument must presuppose.

How to solve it

The forecast projects one favourable factor forward while holding everything else fixed. It therefore assumes that no other contributor to last year's lower cost will reverse next year by enough to swallow the benefit of the richer ore.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 12: Assumption

Hard · Argument Construction

Two years ago Brennan Logistics began paying its delivery drivers a bonus for each month in which they report no damage to their vehicles. Since then, the number of damage reports per vehicle has fallen by half, but the company's spending per vehicle on body repairs has not declined. The fleet manager concludes that the bonus has led drivers to leave damage unreported, so that it is repaired only when mechanics find it during routine inspections.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the fleet manager's argument depends?

  1. A. Routine inspections of Brennan's vehicles detect every instance of damage that drivers fail to report.
  2. B. The bonuses Brennan pays each year cost less than the company would save if damage to its vehicles genuinely fell by half.
  3. C. The average cost of each body repair has not risen enough over the two years to offset a genuine halving in the amount of damage.
  4. D. Delivery companies that pay drivers similar bonuses have also seen the number of damage reports fall.
  5. E. Damage that is left unreported until an inspection costs more to repair than damage that drivers report promptly.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. The average cost of each body repair has not risen enough over the two years to offset a genuine halving in the amount of damage.

  • A. Inspections need to catch most unreported damage for spending to stay flat, not every instance of it.
  • B. This bears on whether the bonus is good value, not on whether drivers are concealing damage.
  • C. Correct. If repair costs had roughly doubled, flat spending would be consistent with drivers causing half as much damage, and the conclusion would lose its support.
  • D. Falling reports elsewhere would not show whether those falls, or this one, reflect concealment or genuinely careful driving.
  • E. Negate it and the argument survives: if late repairs cost the same, unchanged damage still produces unchanged spending.

How to solve it

Flat repair spending alongside halved reports is the manager's evidence that the damage is still happening. But spending could also stay flat if damage genuinely halved while each repair came to cost about twice as much. The argument needs that rival ruled out: negate the key and the spending figure no longer shows any hidden damage.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Evaluate a plan

Looks like: “…most strongly supports the plan” or “…casts the most doubt on the plan”

The task: Judge whether a proposed course of action will achieve its stated goal.

How to attack it: Write down the goal, not just the plan. Support removes an obstacle between the plan and the goal; doubt shows a reason the plan will not reach it or will backfire. A choice that shows the goal is worthwhile, without touching whether the plan achieves it, answers a different question.

Question 13: Evaluate a plan

Easy · Evaluation of a Plan

The council of Deepford proposes to build protected bicycle lanes along four arterial roads. Officials expect the lanes to cut the number of car journeys made within the city, on the ground that many such journeys are short enough to be made by bicycle instead. Critics reply that the lanes will take road space from cars and so worsen congestion for those who continue to drive into the centre.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the officials' expectation?

  1. A. The council of Deepford has secured a grant from the regional transport authority that will meet most of the construction cost.
  2. B. In cities that have built protected bicycle lanes, the number of short car journeys fell sharply within a year.
  3. C. Every resident of Deepford who now makes a short journey by car would switch to a bicycle if a protected lane were available along the route.
  4. D. Protected lanes reduce the number of collisions between cars and cyclists on roads where they are built.
  5. E. The four arterial roads chosen for the new lanes carry more traffic during the morning peak hours than any other roads in Deepford do.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: B. In cities that have built protected bicycle lanes, the number of short car journeys fell sharply within a year.

  • A. Funding determines whether the lanes get built, not whether they change how residents travel.
  • B. Correct. It reports the very outcome the officials predict, in the very circumstances they propose to create.
  • C. A universal switch is far beyond what the officials claim and is not credible as a supporting fact.
  • D. Safety is a separate benefit and does not show that the number of car journeys will fall.
  • E. Heavy traffic makes those roads worth targeting but says nothing about whether drivers will switch.

How to solve it

The officials' claim is that short car journeys will be replaced by bicycle journeys. Evidence that exactly this happened in cities that built the same infrastructure is the most direct support available.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 14: Evaluate a plan

Easy · Evaluation of a Plan

Borrowing at the Kessler County Library has declined among working adults, many of whom commute by train to jobs in a neighboring city. To reverse this decline, the library plans to install lockers at the county's commuter rail stations, where patrons can pick up books they have reserved online and return books they have finished, at any hour. Library staff will restock the lockers each evening.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the plan described above?

  1. A. Several libraries in other states have begun lending tools and musical instruments as well as books.
  2. B. Reserved books that go uncollected for a week are returned to the shelves so that other patrons can borrow them.
  3. C. Most working adults in the county who have stopped borrowing say the branches are never open at times when these adults are free to visit.
  4. D. Most patrons who still visit the library's branches prefer to browse the shelves in person rather than reserve books online.
  5. E. Ridership on the county's commuter trains has fallen by a quarter since many employers began letting staff work from home.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. Most working adults in the county who have stopped borrowing say the branches are never open at times when these adults are free to visit.

  • A. What other libraries lend has no bearing on whether lockers will bring commuters back to borrowing.
  • B. This is an existing rule for reservations and applies whether or not the lockers are installed.
  • C. Correct. It identifies opening hours as the obstacle, which lockers available at any hour at their own stations remove.
  • D. The plan is aimed at people who have stopped visiting, so the habits of those who still come say little about it.
  • E. Fewer commuters passing the lockers makes the plan less likely to succeed, so this weighs against it.

How to solve it

Lockers at stations help only if the obstacle is when and where the library can be reached. Evidence that lapsed borrowers stopped because the branches are closed whenever they are free shows that the plan targets the actual cause of the decline.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 15: Evaluate a plan

Medium · Evaluation of a Plan

Stride, an online shoe retailer, pays the shipping on every item a customer returns, and most shoes sent back to Stride are returned because they do not fit. Because sizing varies from one brand to another, Stride plans to cut its return costs by adding a feature that recommends a size in each brand based on the sizes of shoes the customer has previously bought from Stride and kept.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly suggests that the plan will not achieve its goal?

  1. A. Customers who receive shoes that fit well are more likely to buy from Stride again.
  2. B. Several rival retailers already offer size recommendations based on purchase histories.
  3. C. Some shoes are returned not because they fit poorly but because customers dislike their color once they see them in person.
  4. D. Nearly all of the shoes returned to Stride for poor fit were bought by customers placing their first order.
  5. E. The cost of shipping returned shoes to Stride's warehouse has risen faster over the past two years than the company's revenue has.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: D. Nearly all of the shoes returned to Stride for poor fit were bought by customers placing their first order.

  • A. This adds a benefit of better fit, so it counts in the plan's favor rather than against it.
  • B. That rivals offer similar features does not show whether the feature will reduce Stride's returns.
  • C. Only some returns have this cause, and most are about fit, so the plan still targets the larger share.
  • D. Correct. First-time customers have no history for the feature to draw on, so the returns it targets would continue.
  • E. This makes the goal more pressing but says nothing about whether the feature will achieve it.

How to solve it

The recommendations are built from a customer's past purchases at Stride. They can do nothing for someone buying from Stride for the first time. If nearly all poorly fitting shoes are bought by exactly those customers, the feature never reaches the returns it is meant to prevent.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Evaluate the argument

Looks like: “Which of the following would be most useful to establish in evaluating the argument?”

The task: Choose the question whose answer would make the argument noticeably stronger or weaker.

How to attack it: Answer each choice both ways, yes and no. The right choice matters in both directions: one answer helps the argument and the other hurts it. If both answers leave the argument where it was, the choice is irrelevant.

Question 16: Evaluate the argument

Medium · Evaluation

A regional hospital has been offered scheduling software that its supplier says will cut the time operating theatres stand idle between procedures. The hospital's finance officer notes that theatres currently stand idle for about a fifth of the working day, and argues that even a modest reduction would let the hospital perform enough additional procedures each year to repay the annual licence fee several times over.

Which of the following would be most useful to establish in evaluating the argument?

  1. A. How many other hospitals of broadly comparable size in the region have already bought the same scheduling software from this supplier.
  2. B. Whether the licence fee for the new software is charged every year or as a single payment at installation.
  3. C. Whether the hospital has enough surgeons, anaesthetists and recovery beds available to staff the additional procedures that the freed theatre time would make possible.
  4. D. Whether lengthy retraining would be needed before the hospital's clerks could operate the new software.
  5. E. Whether the hospital's theatres stand idle for the same reasons on every day.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. Whether the hospital has enough surgeons, anaesthetists and recovery beds available to staff the additional procedures that the freed theatre time would make possible.

  • A. A sales record elsewhere is not evidence about this hospital's capacity to use the time that is freed.
  • B. The form of payment does not change the total to be repaid or the hospital's ability to repay it.
  • C. Correct. Without the complementary resources the recovered theatre hours cannot be turned into procedures at all.
  • D. Retraining is a one-off transition cost and does not determine whether the promised gain can be realised.
  • E. Knowing the mix of causes is useful background but does not settle whether extra procedures could be staffed.

How to solve it

Idle theatre time converts into procedures only if surgeons, anaesthetists and recovery beds are available to fill it. If any of those is the real constraint, the freed hours yield nothing and the licence fee is not repaid.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 17: Evaluate the argument

Hard · Evaluation

The city of Ardwick introduced a deposit on beverage containers two years ago: shoppers pay a small surcharge at purchase and recover it by returning the empty container to any retailer. The volume of containers collected for recycling in Ardwick has since risen by a third. The council's environment committee has proposed extending the deposit to food packaging, arguing that the same mechanism will produce a comparable rise in the recycling of that material.

Which of the following would be most useful to establish in evaluating the argument?

  1. A. Whether the surcharge collected on beverage containers has covered the full administrative cost of running the deposit scheme.
  2. B. Where the beverage containers collected under the scheme are processed, whether inside Ardwick itself or at a recycling facility some considerable distance away.
  3. C. Whether the councils of other cities in the region are considering similar deposit schemes of their own for beverage containers.
  4. D. Whether used food packaging can be returned to retailers as readily as empty beverage containers now are.
  5. E. Whether the rise in containers collected merely reflects a rise in the quantity of beverages that Ardwick shoppers buy each year.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: D. Whether used food packaging can be returned to retailers as readily as empty beverage containers now are.

  • A. The committee predicts a rise in recycling, not a surplus. Cost recovery is a separate question from whether the mechanism works.
  • B. Where the material is processed afterwards has no bearing on how much of it shoppers bring back.
  • C. What neighbouring councils intend tells us nothing about how food packaging will behave under Ardwick's scheme.
  • D. Correct. If shoppers cannot practically hand the packaging back, the deposit cannot produce the return behaviour the argument relies on.
  • E. This probes the beverage result and stops there; even a wholly genuine result would not show that packaging behaves the same way.

How to solve it

The deposit works by making return easy and worth a shopper's while. Food packaging is soiled, bulky and various, so whether it can be handed back over a retail counter at all decides whether the mechanism transfers. Nothing else settles that question.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Inference questions

Looks like: “Which of the following can most properly be inferred…?”

The task: Choose the statement the facts given support, with nothing added from outside.

How to attack it: Treat the passage as true and go no further than it goes. The right answer is often modest. Choices that add a cause, a percentage or the word “most” the passage never states are wrong however reasonable they sound.

Question 18: Inference

Hard · Inference

Northmoor Air has flown a daily service between two provincial cities at a loss for six years, in the sense that the fares collected on the route fall short of what the route costs to operate. The airline nevertheless retains the service. Most passengers who board at the smaller city connect at Northmoor's hub onto longer flights, and the airline books the whole of each such fare to the connecting flight rather than to the provincial service.

Which of the following can most properly be inferred from the statements above?

  1. A. Northmoor Air would earn a larger profit overall by withdrawing every route that fails to cover its own costs.
  2. B. Northmoor charges lower fares on the provincial route than its competitors do.
  3. C. The accounting figures for the provincial route may well understate the revenue the airline would lose if it withdrew the service altogether.
  4. D. The provincial service would cover its operating costs if the fares charged on it were raised enough.
  5. E. Passengers boarding at the smaller city pay more for their connecting flights than those joining at the hub.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. The accounting figures for the provincial route may well understate the revenue the airline would lose if it withdrew the service altogether.

  • A. The passage suggests the opposite for this route, and says nothing at all about the airline's other routes.
  • B. No competitor's fares are mentioned, and a loss can arise from high costs as easily as from low fares.
  • C. Correct. Connecting fares are booked to other flights, so the route's own figures leave out revenue it generates.
  • D. Raising fares would also drive passengers away, and nothing in the statements settles the net effect.
  • E. The passage describes how fares are booked internally, not what different passengers are charged.

How to solve it

Fares from connecting passengers are credited elsewhere, so the route's recorded revenue omits traffic the route itself brings in. Withdrawing the service would put that traffic at risk, which is why the recorded loss may overstate the gain from closing it.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 19: Inference

Hard · Inference

At Corvid Software, every engineer promoted to senior engineer last year had led at least one product launch at Corvid before being promoted. The company has never allowed an engineer to lead a product launch without first completing the company's systems architecture course, and that course has always been open only to engineers who have worked at Corvid for at least three years. Several engineers who completed the course last year have not yet led a launch.

Which of the following can most properly be inferred from the statements above?

  1. A. Every engineer promoted to senior engineer at Corvid last year had worked at the company for at least three years.
  2. B. Every Corvid engineer who has led a product launch was promoted to senior engineer last year.
  3. C. Most engineers who have worked at Corvid for at least three years have completed the systems architecture course.
  4. D. None of the engineers who completed the course last year was promoted to senior engineer last year.
  5. E. The engineers who completed the course last year will be promoted to senior engineer once each has led a launch and been at Corvid for three years.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: A. Every engineer promoted to senior engineer at Corvid last year had worked at the company for at least three years.

  • A. Correct. Promotion required a launch, a launch required the course, and the course required three years, each coming before the next.
  • B. This reverses the first statement. Leading a launch was required for promotion, not a guarantee of it.
  • C. Three years makes an engineer eligible for the course; nothing says how many eligible engineers have taken it.
  • D. Only several of last year's graduates of the course are said not to have led a launch; others may have led one and been promoted in the same year.
  • E. It treats conditions that promotion requires as if they were enough to secure it, which the statements never say.

How to solve it

Chain the conditions in order. Promotion last year required having led a launch; leading a launch required having completed the course first; taking the course required three years at Corvid. Each step comes before the next, so everyone promoted last year had at least three years at the company by the time of promotion.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Weaken questions

Looks like: “Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?”

The task: Find the new fact that makes the conclusion less likely to follow from the evidence.

How to attack it: Name the gap first. The strongest weakener usually supplies an alternative explanation for the evidence, or shows the evidence does not apply to the case the conclusion is about. A choice attacking something the argument never relied on does nothing.

Question 20: Weaken

Easy · Argument Evaluation

Marlow Coffee introduced a mobile loyalty application at its two hundred outlets last year. Customers who registered for the application spent, on average, forty percent more at Marlow outlets over the following six months than customers who did not register. The chain's marketing director has concluded that the application causes customers to spend more, and proposes to increase spending on the application at the expense of the advertising budget.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

  1. A. Marlow Coffee spent considerably less on developing the loyalty application than it spends on newspaper advertising in a typical quarter.
  2. B. Several chains competing with Marlow introduced loyalty applications that same year.
  3. C. Customers who already visited Marlow outlets several times a week were far likelier to register for the application than occasional customers.
  4. D. The application allows Marlow to send registered customers a discount voucher on those days when trade is usually slow.
  5. E. Customers who registered spent more at Marlow outlets in the months afterwards than they had immediately before.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. Customers who already visited Marlow outlets several times a week were far likelier to register for the application than occasional customers.

  • A. Relative cost bears on whether the budget shift is wise, not on whether the application caused the extra spending.
  • B. What rivals did affects Marlow's competitive position but leaves the internal comparison exactly where it stood.
  • C. Correct. It shows the two groups differed before registration, so the gap need not be an effect of the application.
  • D. This describes a mechanism by which the application might work, which supports the director rather than undermining him.
  • E. A before-and-after rise within the same customers is evidence for the causal claim, not against it.

How to solve it

The two groups were not assigned; customers sorted themselves. If the heaviest customers were the ones who signed up, the spending gap was there before the application existed and the application need not have caused any of it.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 21: Weaken

Easy · Argument Evaluation

Last spring the city of Dunmore transplanted mature shade trees along forty residential blocks. Over the following summer, household electricity use on those blocks fell by eight percent compared with the summer before, while household use in the rest of the city was essentially unchanged. City officials concluded that shade from the new trees had reduced residents' need for air conditioning, and they have proposed planting mature trees along every residential block in Dunmore.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the officials' conclusion?

  1. A. Transplanting a mature tree costs the city several times as much as planting a sapling.
  2. B. The forty blocks were chosen because a utility program had, that spring, replaced most of their residents' old air conditioners with efficient models.
  3. C. Studies in other cities have found that street trees also reduce storm water runoff and improve air quality.
  4. D. The summer after the planting was, on average, slightly hotter in Dunmore than the summer before it.
  5. E. Homes on the planted blocks that stand closest to the new trees used less electricity than homes on those blocks set farther back.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: B. The forty blocks were chosen because a utility program had, that spring, replaced most of their residents' old air conditioners with efficient models.

  • A. Cost bears on whether the proposal is affordable, not on whether the trees caused the fall in electricity use.
  • B. Correct. It supplies a rival cause confined to the same blocks and the same summer, so the fall no longer points to the trees.
  • C. Other benefits of trees may support planting them, but they say nothing about what cut electricity use on these blocks.
  • D. A hotter summer should have raised air conditioning use, which makes the fall on the shaded blocks more striking, not less.
  • E. A saving that grows with nearness to the trees is what the officials' explanation predicts, so this strengthens their case.

How to solve it

The officials treat the trees as the only thing that changed on the forty blocks. Anything else that cut electricity use on exactly those blocks, over the same summer, breaks the link. New, efficient air conditioners installed on those blocks that spring are such a change, and they also explain why the rest of the city stayed flat.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Question 22: Weaken

Hard · Argument Evaluation

Excavations at the ancient harbor town of Pelmos have recovered fragments of clay storage jars from many centuries of occupation. In layers dated before 300 BCE, jars made on the island of Karsa account for about one fragment in twenty; in layers dated after 300 BCE, they account for nearly one fragment in four. Historians have concluded that Pelmos imported a substantially greater volume of goods from Karsa after 300 BCE than it had before.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the historians' conclusion?

  1. A. Storage jars made on Karsa were larger, on average, than those made in Pelmos or elsewhere, and so tended to break into more fragments when they were discarded.
  2. B. Pelmos came under the rule of a mainland kingdom shortly after 300 BCE and remained under its control for two centuries.
  3. C. The total quantity of goods that Karsa produced for export did not increase at all in the century after 300 BCE.
  4. D. The layers dated after 300 BCE contain far more jar fragments in total than the layers dated before 300 BCE do.
  5. E. After 300 BCE, Pelmos stored its own goods in woven baskets, which rarely survive burial, instead of local clay jars.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: E. After 300 BCE, Pelmos stored its own goods in woven baskets, which rarely survive burial, instead of local clay jars.

  • A. Larger jars would inflate the Karsan count in every layer alike, so they cannot account for a share that changed between the two periods.
  • B. A change of rulers hints that trade might have shifted, but nothing here says in which direction or shows that the fragments mislead.
  • C. Flat output on Karsa caps the island's exports as a whole, but Pelmos could still have taken a larger share of them, so the conclusion survives.
  • D. A larger share of a larger total means many more Karsan fragments in absolute terms, which supports the historians.
  • E. Correct. Local jars vanish from the later layers, so the Karsan share rises even if the volume of imports never changed.

How to solve it

The evidence is the Karsan share of all jar fragments, not the number of Karsan jars. A share can rise because the other jars disappear from the record while imports stay flat. If local goods stopped being stored in clay around 300 BCE, local fragments would thin out and the Karsan share would climb with no change in trade at all.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Strengthen questions

Looks like: “Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?”

The task: Find the new fact that makes the conclusion more likely to follow.

How to attack it: Name the gap, then look for the choice that closes it, very often by ruling out the most obvious alternative explanation. A strengthener does not need to prove the conclusion, only to make it more likely.

Question 23: Strengthen

Easy · Argument Evaluation

A salmon farm added a seaweed extract to the feed given to one of its pens and found that the fish in that pen grew nine percent faster than fish of the same age in the farm's other pens. The extract costs little, and the manager has concluded that adding it to the feed in every pen would raise the farm's total output by enough to justify the modest expense.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

  1. A. The seaweed used to make the extract is harvested from beds near the farm.
  2. B. Salmon raised on feed containing the extract command a slightly higher price at market than salmon raised on the farm's ordinary feed do.
  3. C. No salmon farm that has adopted the extract has reported a decline in the growth of its fish.
  4. D. The farm's other pens were given feed of exactly the same composition that the farm had used in each of the three seasons immediately preceding the trial.
  5. E. The farm's pens match in water temperature, stocking density and hatchery.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: E. The farm's pens match in water temperature, stocking density and hatchery.

  • A. Where the raw material comes from affects supply, not whether the extract accelerates growth.
  • B. A price premium would help revenue, but the conclusion is about output rather than about price.
  • C. An absence of reported declines is weak evidence and does not show that the extract itself produced the gain.
  • D. Consistency in the control feed is welcome but does not rule out differences between the pens themselves.
  • E. Correct. It eliminates the differences most likely to produce a growth gap other than the extract itself.

How to solve it

A one-pen comparison is only as good as the match between the pens. Ruling out the standard confounders — temperature, crowding and the origin of the stock — leaves the extract as the difference that remains, which is what the manager needs.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 24: Strengthen

Medium · Argument Evaluation

A manufacturer of solar panels has developed an anti-reflective coating that, in laboratory tests, raises the electricity a panel generates by about six percent. The coating adds roughly two percent to the cost of a finished panel. Because installers judge panels almost entirely on the price of each unit of output they deliver, the manufacturer's engineers predict that panels carrying the coating will displace uncoated panels across the whole market within three years.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

  1. A. The manufacturer's patents on the coating do not expire soon.
  2. B. Rival manufacturers are developing coatings of their own but have published no commercial results.
  3. C. Panels coated with the new material retain their entire output advantage after a full decade of outdoor exposure.
  4. D. Installers will refuse to buy uncoated panels once coated panels reach the market, whatever they cost.
  5. E. Applying the coating requires equipment that the manufacturer's existing factories can install without halting current production.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: C. Panels coated with the new material retain their entire output advantage after a full decade of outdoor exposure.

  • A. Patents protect the manufacturer's position but say nothing about whether coated panels deliver cheaper output.
  • B. Rival programmes at an earlier stage neither support nor undermine the claim about coated panels displacing uncoated ones.
  • C. Correct. It carries the laboratory gain into field conditions over the life of the panel, which is what installers actually price.
  • D. It asserts an absolute refusal that contradicts the argument's own premise that installers judge panels on price per unit of output.
  • E. Smooth installation helps the manufacturer's schedule, but the two percent cost figure is already given as a premise.

How to solve it

The evidence is a laboratory figure; the conclusion is about panels installed in the field for years. Showing that the six percent advantage survives a decade of weather closes exactly that gap, because installers price output over a panel's whole life.

From GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1

Question 25: Strengthen

Medium · Argument Evaluation

Biologists surveying ponds in the Tamsin River basin found that ponds where a nonnative crayfish has become established contain, on average, less than a third as many dragonfly larvae as ponds the crayfish has not reached. The crayfish is known to feed on a wide range of small aquatic animals. The biologists concluded that predation by the crayfish has reduced the number of dragonfly larvae in the ponds it has invaded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the biologists' conclusion?

  1. A. Before the crayfish arrived, the ponds it later invaded held about as many dragonfly larvae as ponds it never reached.
  2. B. The crayfish uproots much of the vegetation in the ponds it invades, and dragonfly larvae depend on such plants for shelter.
  3. C. Dragonfly larvae are an important food for fish and wading birds in the basin.
  4. D. The nonnative crayfish has spread to more ponds in the basin in each of the past five years.
  5. E. Dragonfly larvae are known to prey on the young of several kinds of crayfish, including the nonnative crayfish now found in the basin.
Show the answer and explanation

Answer: A. Before the crayfish arrived, the ponds it later invaded held about as many dragonfly larvae as ponds it never reached.

  • A. Correct. It rules out a difference between the ponds that predates the crayfish, which is the main alternative to the biologists' explanation.
  • B. This offers a route other than predation by which the crayfish could reduce the larvae, so it weakens the specific conclusion drawn.
  • C. It explains why the decline matters, not what caused it.
  • D. The pace of the invasion bears on how far the problem reaches, not on whether the crayfish is eating the larvae.
  • E. It links the two species but runs the predation the other way, and does nothing to show the crayfish eats the larvae.

How to solve it

The evidence is a comparison between two groups of ponds taken at one moment. The crayfish may simply have settled in ponds that were already poor for dragonflies. Evidence that the two groups started out alike before the invasion removes that possibility and leaves the crayfish as the likely cause.

Written for this page. It does not appear in any timed paper.

Where to go next

Untimed practice by type builds the method. Timed practice shows whether it holds at about 1 minute 57 seconds a question, mixed in with Reading Comprehension. The GMAT Verbal practice tests run the full section on the real clock, free and without an account. For every format in one place, including Quant and Data Insights, see the GMAT sample questions. If you are still getting to know the exam, start with what the GMAT is and how it is scored.

Free diagnostic

Find out where you stand, in one free test

Take a full length GMAT Focus practice test on the real timing, get a baseline score on the official 205 to 805 scale, and see the section breakdown that tells you what to fix first.

  • No card required
  • Scored 205 to 805
  • Instructor assigned on day one